Upload your case files and get a structured evidentiary gap analysis against Kenyan law - with your prosecution brief drafted and every claim traced to its source.
Free to start · No installation required · Case files encrypted at rest
Republic v. [Accused Person]
Murder, Section 203 Penal Code Cap 63
AI Recommendation
Obtain post-mortem report from Gov. Pathologist urgently. This is a blocking gap. Trial cannot proceed without it.
Extracted facts
“To be released on bail or bond, on reasonable conditions, pending a charge or trial, unless there are compelling reasons not to be released.”
Evidence obtained in violation of rights shall be excluded if admission would render the trial unfair...
Not a generic AI tool. Every feature is designed around what evidence is required and how Kenyan courts assess cases.
Upload PF1, PF2, PF3, P3 forms, OB extracts, and witness statements. AI extracts structured data with source citations.
For each charge, checks which statutory elements are evidenced and which are missing, based on Kenya's hardcoded statutory definitions.
AI-generated draft in standard brief format. Every paragraph cites its source document and page. Unsupported claims flagged for review.
0–100 composite score: witness availability, evidence completeness, admissibility risks, charge element coverage.
Query Constitution of Kenya 2010, hardcoded with no hallucination. Live search on Kenya Law (kenyalaw.org) for case precedents.
Legal definitions are hardcoded from statute. AI only extracts, quoting verbatim source text for every claim. Human verification required.
Track witness availability, flag consistency issues across statements, generate witness schedule for trial.
Every AI action is logged: what prompt was sent, what was returned, who verified it. Immutable for accountability.
Default: Llama 3.1 on your device. Case files never leave. Pro users can upgrade to Groq for cloud speed. Enterprise brings their own model.
CaseLens is designed with the understanding that in criminal cases, a hallucinated fact or fabricated citation can destroy a case and wrongly convict an innocent person.
Hardcoded legal definitions
Charge elements from Penal Code Cap 63, Sexual Offences Act 2006, Evidence Act Cap 80 are hardcoded in TypeScript, never AI-generated.
Verbatim source citations
Every AI-extracted fact must include the exact verbatim quote from the source document, plus page number. No citation = not shown.
Human verification required
No AI output goes directly to court. Every claim requires advocate review and explicit approval before inclusion in briefs.
Immutable audit trail
Every AI action is logged with the prompt, response, model version, and verifying user. Cannot be modified retroactively.
Kenya Data Protection Act compliant
All personal data is processed in accordance with the 2019 Act. Data subjects' rights are upheld and no case data is sold or shared.
“[Accused Person]”
PF1_Charge_Sheet.pdf · Page 1
“...that [ACCUSED PERSON], on the 3rd day of March 2026 at Westlands within Nairobi County, murdered [DECEASED PERSON]...”
Individual advocates use it free. Law offices get the institutional layer.