Interactive demo with sample case data. Create a free account to analyse your own case files.
See how CaseLens ingests your documents, identifies evidentiary gaps against Kenyan law, and drafts your prosecution brief - every claim traced to its source.
Murder, contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204, Penal Code Cap 63
Not trial-ready - 2 critical gaps must be addressed
Sample case - Republic v. [Accused Person], OB/456/2026 · Murder S.203
OB/456/2026 · HC CR 89/2026
Murder, contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code Cap 63
Not trial-ready - 2 critical gaps must be addressed
Unlawful killing of a human being
Post-mortem Report, pg.4
Identity of accused
OB Extract, pg.2; Witness Stmt, pg.1
Causation - act caused death
Post-mortem links wound to death, not to accused's act
Malice aforethought
No supporting evidence found
Weapon linked to accused
No supporting evidence found
1 blocking gap: Malice aforethought
Evidence of premeditation or express intent required before this case can proceed to trial.
How source citations work
“Penetrating stab wound (chest)”
Source document
Post_Mortem_Report.pdf, Page 4
“Cause of death: Haemorrhage secondary to a penetrating stab wound to the chest.”
What the demo shows
Constitution search
Query the Constitution of Kenya 2010 by keyword or article.
Kenya Law research
Search eKLR for relevant precedents and case law.
Zero-hallucination
Legal definitions hardcoded from statute. AI quotes verbatim or stays silent.
Audit trail
Every AI action logged with model version and verifying advocate.
Ready to analyse your own case files?
Free account. Upload your charge sheet and see your readiness score in under 2 minutes.
Or sign in if you already have one.